Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:55:47 +0100 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ale@freebsd.org Subject: Re: All php ports maintained by Ale missing long descriptions Message-ID: <200601151855.53000.flz@xbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGOEJCHLAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> References: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGOEJCHLAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1178051.CiHtI2HJhr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 15 January 2006 18:42, fbsd_user wrote: > The answer to your smart ass question is YES. > That long description field is there for a purpose. > Loading it with bull shit does not make the port collection any more > easy to use. > It is not the readers job to guess what the port does. > So if you don't have any value to add to this post please keep your > silly thoughts to your self. > You only make your self look like a fool and waste peoples time. First, you didn't need to send this to -ports. Then, you could have been a bit more polite. Finally, as a long time FreeBSD user and smart person, you could have used the usual way to report such a problem using send-pr or its web front-end. =2D-=20 =46lorent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org =46reeBSD Committer --nextPart1178051.CiHtI2HJhr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDyoyoMxEkbVFH3PQRApnFAJ4/boV2mX6RDtQAlnGJ7WFhY1/f6ACdF2E/ Pae7Pb6XGXufYxqqs0cs0+8= =4NMt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1178051.CiHtI2HJhr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601151855.53000.flz>