Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 18:50:44 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [package - 140amd64-default][security/softether-devel] Failed for softether-devel-4.43.9799.b in build Message-ID: <4gnid7yos5lagujtvzoeqbrmgg5yhg5ifbv2stmt772xwtlajr@4kxjwsie2wen> In-Reply-To: <86ikz7vboj.fsf@ltc.des.dev> References: <6649770b.2812.4e959043@beefy12.nyi.freebsd.org> <29539043-8902-45dc-8d3a-98fda99a1d18@FreeBSD.org> <86ikz7vboj.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:58:20AM UTC, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > pkg-fallout reports the following build error. However, it builds > > perfectly on my local poudriere setup. Could anyone have an idea > > about the difference between local poudriere vs build farm? > > Parallelization. The upstream Makefile assumes that the sources are > compiled in order and creates the object directory only when compiling > what it believes to be the first one. Either patch the upstream > Makefile or add MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to the port Makefile. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.org > Thanks. I could't reproduce the build failure even I do parallel build but I have no doubt that the issue is related to parallelization indeed. Probably the first one finishes before the task depends on first one starts due to fast-enough processor. -- meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4gnid7yos5lagujtvzoeqbrmgg5yhg5ifbv2stmt772xwtlajr>