Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:27:56 +0200
From:      Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com>
To:        Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net>
Cc:        gballet@gmail.com, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, chuckr@telenix.org, ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: Pandora
Message-ID:  <F2CD10F4-2EBA-447B-BB37-2F75B490A421@semihalf.com>
In-Reply-To: <200904181942.n3IJg5Yi097493@casselton.net>
References:  <200904181942.n3IJg5Yi097493@casselton.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 2009-04-18, at 21:42, Mark Tinguely wrote:

>> <my stuff removed>
>> OK, then, I'll hunt around for whatever I can find to compare the  
>> armv6 with armv7.
>
> I just looked at the OMAP glossy doc even says :
>
> 	Fully Software-Compatible With C64x and ARM9.
>
> ARM9 is ARMv5.

Hi Mark,
Just to clarify: older generations of OMAP were indeed ARMv5, but  
OMAP3 (found on Beagle board) is Cortex-A8 i.e. v7, also the upcoming  
OMAP4 is v7 as well (Cortex-A9, multicore).

Rafal




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F2CD10F4-2EBA-447B-BB37-2F75B490A421>