Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:37:28 -0800 From: underway@comcast.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: C/C++ Message-ID: <axn0axttwn.0ax@mail.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <p0600201dbbdb2b1cc760@[10.0.1.2]> (Brad Knowles's message of "Sat, 15 Nov 2003 02:04:32 %2B0100") References: <20031114044623.C119838124@mail.blarg.net> <x64qx6vequ.qx6@mail.comcast.net> <000801c3ab12$93e5d560$0200000a@io> <p0600201dbbdb2b1cc760@[10.0.1.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> writes: > Many folks have asked about the BSD daemon's name. Contrary > to a myth first started by some advertising droid at Walnut > Creek, the daemon's name is NOT Chuck. He is very proud of > the fact that he does not have a name, he is just the BSD > daemon. If you insist on a name, call him beastie. Maybe the British have it right; they say "He is called Chuck", rather than "He is named Chuck". There's no denying that Beastie is called Chuck.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?axn0axttwn.0ax>