Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:27:30 +0100 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@apple.com> Subject: Re: A modest proposal for better errno values... Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20030513102353.02ab02d0@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <E371408A-8520-11D7-8900-000393BB9222@apple.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, At 09:57 13/5/03, Jordan Hubbard wrote: >[stuff] >#define EDOOFUS 88 /* Programming error */ >[more stuff] Before the noise becomes unbearable, I have a question: Why isn't EINVAL appropriate to the case in question? -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 989 4254
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20030513102353.02ab02d0>