Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:46:01 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Allan Fields <bsd@afields.ca> Cc: Bjoern Koenig <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 Message-ID: <20040622164400.D845@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20040622193319.GD594@afields.ca> References: <20040622120059.1F96F16A4F0@hub.freebsd.org> <20040622130901.7F0A31A3@hoppel.local> <20040622193319.GD594@afields.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Allan Fields wrote: > the wrong answer from a technical standpoint. Also placing code in the > corner won't fix it: even if it is made to work under 5, many want to > use it in 4 still. ;) Many *are* using it in 4 quite effectively ... those that tout it as being 'broken' all the time are those that are either trying to do something that is known to cause problems (ie. FIFOs) or those that look at the man page and 'quote scripture' :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622164400.D845>