Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 03:26:37 +0000 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@anongoth.pl> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r506498 - in head: devel/py-lxml editors/encryptpad games/lpairs graphics/comical lang/harbour mail/archiveopteryx mail/archiveopteryx-devel multimedia/oscam news/nget Message-ID: <20190714032636.GD18049@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20190713004647.GA32051@lonesome.com> References: <201907130007.x6D07Z4Z010235@repo.freebsd.org> <20190713002946.GA99641@ThinkPad-X200.g.anongoth.pl> <20190713004647.GA32051@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 12:46:47AM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 02:29:46AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > Why not put USES=compiler:c11 for those ports where you set > > USE_GCC=yes after checking whether we use base GCC? > > Possibly. I was really focussed on smashing the ARCH definitions; > most of these changes were to things that would not have been fixed > by USES. After looking at this, this is "case 8" of my to-do list. We need to figure out whether we want to eliminate all the instances thereof. I figure if I do it, danfe will complain that I didn't test it with c89 or c99 first, because those are the "most correct". Right now I just feel like I can't win. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190714032636.GD18049>