Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:28:23 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD flood of 8 breakage announcements in 3 mins. Message-ID: <5d74a839-50ef-d8c0-b541-15d9b875b7e2@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <6CE35CEB-C2AB-47B1-AA86-BC9C91B2B8A6@gmail.com> References: <CAOtMX2hA2AfVuNrFxDhXLpY74UAcrWXSd0GjZ1uJJq2vZ5T1qw@mail.gmail.com> <201905151544.x4FFiR0G067138@fire.js.berklix.net> <CADBaqmj5wAP-uG6RmOA_zTgQ1VG%2BT0CyUie3SYks4ooPqPRpOw@mail.gmail.com> <6CE35CEB-C2AB-47B1-AA86-BC9C91B2B8A6@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/15/19 6:16 PM, Matt Garber wrote: > Exactly. If batching 8 (or more) individual bugs/issues together into > one release is really causing admin/manpower overload and angst,then > maybe it’s time in your situation to use the binary updates (which > would only be a single `freebsd-update` and reboot, so there would > be no ‘sudden unplanned outages’) rather than tracking src and > remediating each individual bug at a time. Maybe I'm dumb, but I still don't get what "src vs binary" has to do with "8 vs 1"... I ran a single "svn update; make buildworld; make kernel; make installworld; reboot", not 8... bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5d74a839-50ef-d8c0-b541-15d9b875b7e2>