Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Jan 2007 8:39:44 -0800
From:      Vizion <vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Cc:        beech@alaskaparadise.com
Subject:   Re: mozilla - bind conflict _
Message-ID:  <20070101163943.GFJP60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of 
> Beech Rintoul
> Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 7:08 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Vizion
> Subject: Re: mozilla - bind conflict _
> 
> 
> On Monday 01 January 2007 03:00, Vizion wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am having problems upgrading mozilla-1.7.13,2 ro 
> mozilla-1.7.13_1,2
> > (www/mozilla)
> >
> > Build fails
> > mozilla-1.7..13_1,2: bind installed with 
> PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND causes
> > problems.
> >
> > I first recompiled bind9 without this option but got the 
> same failure.
> >
> > Then I deinstalled bind9 entirely and retried the portupgrade after
> > portsclean -C only to get the same failure.
> >
> > Suggestions please
> >
> > Thanks
> > david
> 
> If you have a bind line in your /etc/make.config 
> (PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9) 
> remove it. Alternately, you can do a "make -k" to override 
> the error, but if 
> you do that keep a close eye on your build to make sure you 
> don't have an 
> error somewhere else that gets ignored.
> 
> Beech

Thanks -- I should have mentioned that I had checked make.config as I had the same idea..I am now wondering where the &*^% the system is getting the idea that PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND is valid for bind... puzzled ignorance reins supreme here.

David 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070101163943.GFJP60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com>