Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:10:22 +0600 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz@norma.perm.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: carp regression in 9.1 ? Message-ID: <5146F61E.3040601@norma.perm.ru> In-Reply-To: <39FC9737-4F34-4978-BDFE-17410CD2E5C4@my.gd> References: <3B04FCB1-D0D4-4BC9-BB15-5221F438738C@my.gd> <514594D7.1020202@norma.perm.ru> <39FC9737-4F34-4978-BDFE-17410CD2E5C4@my.gd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. On 18.03.2013 14:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > I'm afraid I can't afford 10.x, this is for production, although I acknowledge the problems you're faced with. > > Regarding 8.x, this is a guest VM running on proxmox 2.3 which doesn't support stock 8.x (need the virtio kernel option, I'll get a thread reference when I hit work). > > So yeah I'm kinda fucked here... ;) > This is of course up to you to decide, but I feel like I should encourage you - 10.x isn't that scarry as it seems to be. I also run it on a production (though my production may be not as harsh as yours), - this is a main router for a LAN consisting of 500+ machines, it also runs a squid proxy with 200+ active users (AD integrated, winbind, kerberos and stuff) and a HFSC traffic shaper. Plus, a bunch of routing protocols - ospf, ospfv3 and a load of network services like SMTP/HTTP/DHCP. Plus, it's a zfs installation. At least, after upgrade from 9.1-STABLE to a random -CURRENT I didn't notice any degradation, only improvements. I had all of your fears right before the upgrade, none of it became real. Eugene.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5146F61E.3040601>