Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 02 Aug 1997 02:48:21 -0500
From:      Tony Overfield <tony@dell.com>
To:        Craig Johnston <craig@gnofn.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Pentium II?
Message-ID:  <3.0.2.32.19970802024821.0069d68c@bugs.us.dell.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970729133929.22125C-100000@sparkie.gnofn.org >
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970729100017.26870A-100000@misery.sdf.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:02 PM 7/29/97 -0500, Craig Johnston wrote:
>
>[black helicopters deleted]
>I wouldn't count
>on not running into bugs in the relatively untested slot 1 chipset.  

No.  The Pentium II uses Pentium Pro chipsets, not Pentium chipsets 
or "Slot 1 chipsets."

>Slot 1 is also entirely proprietary -- Intel's response to more
>competition than it likes from AMD and now Cyrix.

No.  Think like an engineer and you will probably be able to 
understand why Slot 1 was created.

-
Tony





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.2.32.19970802024821.0069d68c>