Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Apr 1996 13:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Jim Dennis <jimd@mistery.mcafee.com>
To:        filip@sprakrad.no (Filip Stokkeland)
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
Message-ID:  <199604192027.NAA24247@mistery.mcafee.com>
In-Reply-To: <286E679429A@sprakrad.no> from "Filip Stokkeland" at Apr 19, 96 10:50:46 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> Hi!
> I'm an old DOS-user who has started to look at Unix. I've tried a 
> couple of Linux distributins the last weeks. Then I found this 
> FreeBSD stuff. What's the difference between Linux and FreeBSD?
> And what's this NetBSD-thing?

   Filip, 

	FreeBSD and NetBSD grew out of schisms during the developement
	of 386BSD (Mr. & Mrs. Jolitz).

	Linux was independently written by Linux Torvalds (and many
	others on the net).

	This distinction applies to the history and authorship of the 
	kernel and most/some of the device drivers.

	The bulk of the applications and utilities for all three OS'
	is ported from FSF (GNU) and other publicly available sources.
	
	All three use ports of the same X Windows implementation
	(XFree86).

	In terms of differences that a (new to Unix) DOS convert would
	see:  they aren't consequential.  Here's my opinions:

		FreeBSD is better for PC servers.  Linux seems to be better
		for personal workstations.  NetBSD is available for 
		Mac, Amiga,  and SPARC platforms.  FreeBSD is more stable.
		Linux has a "cooler" name, gets more media attention, 
		has a wider variety of hardware drivers and has "cooler"
		new stuff written for it.  FreeBSD conforms much more closely
		the the standards and conventions of BSD unix (with approx.
		25 years of tradition and history).  There are no books
		on FreeBSD -- mostly there don't have to be as the normal
		books on BSD should suffice.  There are lots of books on
		Linux -- there have to be since there are lots of things
		that are "new and improved" about Linux and because Linux
		attracts more people who are totally new to Unix-like 
		OS'.

	That's it in a nutshell (ooops -- now I'll have O'Reilly chasing
	after me <g>).

	For more info I'd suggest getting FAQ's from:

	rtfm.mit.edu

		specifically from these directories:
		
		ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet-by-hierarchy/comp/unix/bsd
		ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet-by-hierarchy/comp/os

	
	Also you can check out the home sites for each of these 
	web sites:

		http://www.linux.org
		http://www.freebsd.org
		http://www.netbsd.org

> 
> Do you know where to get FreeBSD on CDROM?

		Walnut Creek (http://www.cdrom.com)

	Oddly enough I don't know where to get NetBSD on CD.
	Obviously there are over a dozen different Linux CD distributions.
	386BSD is available (the ads are always run in Dr. Dobbs Journal).

Jim Dennis,
System Administrator,
McAfee Associates
 





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604192027.NAA24247>