Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 02:56:41 +1000 (EST) From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: bad clone routes ? Message-ID: <199506121656.CAA20926@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sometime not so long ago, I asked why clone routes didn't show up in "netstat -r" and received the answer .. "try netstat -ra" .. ok, I did that, now I show .. asstdc:~ % netstat -ran Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 202.14.234.68 UGSc 100 359 ed0 4.41.0.4 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 363 ed0 3526 ^^^^^^^^ 18.26.0.36 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 381 ed0 2879 38.8.5.2 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 359 ed0 1132 38.8.24.2 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 379 ed0 1233 38.8.50.2 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 362 ed0 3516 59.17.113.29 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 360 ed0 1557 ^^^^^^^^^^^^ 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 152 lo0 128.8.73.9 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 384 ed0 3274 [ .. ] 199.2.252.10 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 360 ed0 3596 202.12.127 202.14.234.69 UGc 3 11993 ed0 202.12.127.66 202.14.234.69 UGHW 0 18 ed0 202.12.127.67 202.14.234.69 UGHW 0 8118 ed0 202.14.234.49 202.14.234.68 UGHW3 0 153890 ed0 2869 202.14.234.64 link#1 UC 0 0 202.14.234.65 0:0:c0:ec:85:4e UHLW 3 26058 lo0 202.14.234.68 0:0:c0:25:9c:4e UHLW 101 0 ed0 304 202.14.234.69 0:40:33:22:94:e1 UHLW 6 3601 ed0 339 202.14.234.79 link#1 UHLW 1 691 224 link#1 UCS 0 0 The underlined routes are garbage. They appear to actually in the kernel because snmpnetstat shows them as well. Any ideas ? Also note that I have one interface on this machine and I get .. asstdc:~ % /usr/sbin/arp -a asstdc.scgt.oz.au (202.14.234.65) at 0:0:c0:ec:85:4e permanent gw1.scgt.oz.au (202.14.234.68) at 0:0:c0:25:9c:4e gw3.scgt.oz.au (202.14.234.69) at 0:40:33:22:94:e1 ? (202.14.234.79) at (incomplete) .. an arp attempt for the broadcast address (with netmask 255.255.255.240). Is this normal ? michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506121656.CAA20926>