Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:20:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@yahoo.com> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: repocopy lam7 --> lam Message-ID: <20050122152035.32578.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi;
According to lam's website:
"LAM 6.5.9 is not recommended because the LAM source code has seen a lot of
changes, bug fixes and new features since then. It is still available for
download only because some vendors still require it."
They also recommend lam 7.1.1 for all lam/mpi users.
I've been suggesting to the LAM maintainers that we should repocopy lam to
lam6, and make lam7 the new lam from now on. I'm not the maintainer of either
so I probably shouldn't be sending the PR. Just wondering if there are
objections to this.
best regards,
Pedro.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050122152035.32578.qmail>