Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:33:00 +0000 From: Khilan Gudka <Khilan.Gudka@cl.cam.ac.uk> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: chromium@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <robert.watson@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>, drysdale@google.com Subject: Re: Status of sandbox/Capsicum support in the Chromium FreeBSD port Message-ID: <CAEtTSAbv3VwPkG4UZ=4a2XuVU3Zg4J3r_dD%2BJbtNpK9w-PuRZA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADL2u4h4BDsQkum0QqpXMNBRk7h2f4p=ED3Qo53LnwXn7PPe8g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEtTSAbYraLRKNLaamA4ScsgsTbcQSnLN6wnwQe6qSgg4aLgiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADL2u4h4BDsQkum0QqpXMNBRk7h2f4p=ED3Qo53LnwXn7PPe8g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Rene On 30 January 2014 11:27, Ren=C3=A9 Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote: > 2014-01-30 Khilan Gudka <Khilan.Gudka@cl.cam.ac.uk>: > > Dear Chromium port maintainer(s) > > > > I was wondering what the current status was with regards to sandboxing > > renderer processes. In particular, now that Capsicum comes as standard = in > > FreeBSD, I'm interested in running Chromium with Capsicum enabled. Robe= rt > > Watson (my supervisor, and whose office is opposite mine) did an initia= l > > version a few years ago (https://github.com/rwatson/chromium-capsicum) > but > > these patches were not upstreamed. > > > For what its worth, George Liaskos (on chromium@) and I started > submitting our > patches upstream, but it will take a while I guess given the number of > patches. Is there any sandboxing being done at all currently in the FreeBSD port? Cheers -- Khilan Gudka Research Associate Security Group Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~kg365/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEtTSAbv3VwPkG4UZ=4a2XuVU3Zg4J3r_dD%2BJbtNpK9w-PuRZA>