Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 10:26:11 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Brian N. Handy" <handy@sag.space.lockheed.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patches from -current for -stable I'd like to commit after testing Message-ID: <199710221626.KAA10426@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.96.971022091306.23971I-100000@sag.space.lockheed.com> References: <199710221610.KAA10346@rocky.mt.sri.com> <Pine.OSF.3.96.971022091306.23971I-100000@sag.space.lockheed.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Can you yank *all* the patches and see if they are making the > >difference? It's possible the 'low-power' changes may have an adverse > >affect, since with both sysctl's unset, the only changes are the modem > >speaker and the power. > > I was about to go back to -STABLE as of this morning and give that a try, > or should I step back to before yesterday's upgrade? Either or. The patches I sent out were against -stable as of yesterday evening, so re-cvsup'ing would be the same as backing out the changes. (But, keep them around in case since I may have you do some experimentation with them if you don't mind.) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710221626.KAA10426>