Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 21:06:02 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <4294CC9A.1000200@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <20050525185427.GB92006@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <84dead7205052420503fded0e9@mail.gmail.com> <4293FD27.90500@incubus.de> <20050525042706.GA60021@xor.obsecurity.org> <4294054C.9080207@incubus.de> <20050525050943.GA64320@xor.obsecurity.org> <42940A81.1030801@incubus.de> <20050525052214.GA76339@xor.obsecurity.org> <42940C87.5000705@incubus.de> <20050525053054.GA76491@xor.obsecurity.org> <4294AB75.9080908@incubus.de> <20050525185427.GB92006@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > Others don't see this though, and in other cases it was *definitively > proven* to be caused by the issue I mentioned. I'll have to think > more about what to try next..thanks for running the tests. Perhaps it's something SATA-related? mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4294CC9A.1000200>