Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 22:30:02 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: davem@caip.rutgers.edu (David S. Miller) Cc: terry@lambert.org, deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au Subject: Re: GNAT-pthreads integration bugs/questions Message-ID: <199705190330.WAA10372@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199705190257.WAA16061@darkwing.rutgers.edu> from "David S. Miller" at "May 18, 97 10:57:25 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> > Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 19:41:17 -0700 (MST) > > > Put it at the bottom on the threads stack... > > There is no threads stack in an rfork. > > A thread lacks a stack with rfork(), is this what you are > saying? How in the world does this work? > Why does rfork need to be concerned with a stack? It can be handled in userland. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705190330.WAA10372>