Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 01:52:03 -0500 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPUTYPE=native handling Message-ID: <20111109064719.GA39458@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20111108002556.GA91218@freebsd.org> References: <20111108002556.GA91218@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:25:56AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > i've seen dozens of issues, where people set CPUTYPE=native. although this > works in a lot of cases, it doesn't in others. why don't we simply add > something like I thought it was reccomened to use 'CPUTYPE?=' syntax therefore ultimately allowing the build to omit the CPUTYPE for its own setting... since not all optimizations done for -march or -mcpu are good for the whole source tree.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111109064719.GA39458>