Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:04:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Joseph Mallett <jmallett@newgold.net>
To:        <chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   ln(1) manpage
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSO.4.33.0104241901540.19045-100000@aphex.newgold.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In situations such as ln(1), where there's a symlink that makes the
command perform differently, as is the case with 'link', wouldn't it make
sense to move that information to link(1) manpage? Someone doing man ln
probably doesn't care about what link does, and view versa, no? They
could, however, have it in the '.SH SEE ALSO' section. That's what it's
for, yeah?

--
[ Joseph Mallett           <jmallett@[newgold.net|xmrg.com|xMach.org]> ]
[ xMach Core Team         xMach: Proactively Unbloated Microkernel BSD ]
[ Proud Open/Free/Net/4.4BSD User; C Programmer; Mad ] [ www.xMach.org ]

Those who dial will know its meaning: 6545666,555,666,6545666655654


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSO.4.33.0104241901540.19045-100000>