Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:30:31 +0100 From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> To: "Claudiu Chirita" <claudiu.chirita@rdsnet.ro> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: decreasing interrupt CPU load Message-ID: <040701c4b854$72f0e4d0$7f06000a@int.mediasurface.com> References: <004e01c4b831$c317c640$0c0210ac@ADMIN1> <028b01c4b837$b7532c90$7f06000a@int.mediasurface.com> <005301c4b840$0444ec20$0c0210ac@ADMIN1> <41792185.7010503@rdsnet.ro> <038f01c4b84f$b63fd3e0$7f06000a@int.mediasurface.com> <4179307F.3060205@rdsnet.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If you try standard packets e.g. an unlimited single ftp transfer
does it limit to HZ interrupts / s? That's what I see when just looking
in systat ( vm ) without this its around 4000 -> 6000 i/s
depending on if link0 is active.
Steve / K
----- Original Message -----
From: "Claudiu Chirita" <claudiu.chirita@rdsnet.ro>
> I've made some tests with netperf to generate small size UDP packets.
> With polling enabled, I saw performance decreasing.
> Claudiu C.
================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?040701c4b854$72f0e4d0$7f06000a>