Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:16:01 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port-lint run Message-ID: <20011226211601.B69259@databits.net> In-Reply-To: <20011227115329.A38024@k7.mavetju.org>; from edwin@mavetju.org on Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:53:29AM %2B1100 References: <20011227115329.A38024@k7.mavetju.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
++ 27/12/01 11:53 +1100 - Edwin Groothuis:
| Greetings,
|
| After running portlint on the ports maintained by me, I wonder how
| people (and commiters) would response on a flood of PR's which
| would maximize the thumbs-up output of portlint for all ports.
|
| Mostly the patches will change rm in ${RM}, remove trailing spaces
| and so on. Commiting them will be a boring task, and the absence
| of the will of commiting them will not be good for the mood of the
| persons who put some time in it.
|
| So before I start my flood of PR's I ask you, should I do it or not?
I'd say keep them in your local tree, and next time you submit an update
for the port include those changes.
-pete
--
Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)]
finger petef@databits.net for PGP key
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011226211601.B69259>