Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:18:18 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/osf1 osf1_signal.c src/sys/coda coda_psdev.c src/sys/compat/linprocfs linprocfs.c src/sys/compat/linux linux_misc.c linux_signal.c src/sys/compat/svr4 svr4_filio.c svr4_signal.c src/sys/conf files ... Message-ID: <20021001234818.GA99820@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021001133228.32141F-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <200210011715.g91HFrMn025046@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021001133228.32141F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 1 October 2002 at 13:35:27 -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > >> jmallett 2002/10/01 10:15:53 PDT >> >> Modified files: >> sys/alpha/osf1 osf1_signal.c >> ... >> Log: >> Back our kernel support for reliable signal queues. >> >> Requested by: rwatson, phk, and many others > > Thanks. > > The way forward from here is probably to post a description of the > changes, pointer to the patch, and rationale for the changes to arch@, as > well as to do a bit more research on the POSIX realtime signalling > capabilities to place the work in a bit more context. As most FreeBSD > developers probably are unfamiliar with those semantics, describing them > and relating them to these changes in the post would probably be useful > :-). Done correctly, this would also be the basis for comprehensive, permanent documentation on the subject. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021001234818.GA99820>