Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:46:03 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/29931: problems with kern.corefile handling Message-ID: <20010823214608.068E93E31@bazooka.unixfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <20010824002924.C1714@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@ringlet.net on "Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:29:24 %2B0300"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> writes: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:21:18PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> writes: > > > This looks genuine. Any objections to committing it, and MFC'ing before > > > 4.4 comes out? > > > > I don't see any reason to rush the MFC. > > Mmmm.. preventing foot-shooting? A panicked kernel is a bit too harsh > a punishment for a misconfigured kern.corefile, IMHO.. > Granted, this level of misconfiguration is not easy to attain ;) > But it could always happen as a result of a cut-and-paste-o and > corefiles kept in a central directory or something.. I didn't say it shouldn't be MFC'd at all, just that I think it shouldn't be MFC'd this late into a code freeze since it's hardly critical. Anyway, that's for jkh and murray to decide. There's nothing wrong with the patch that I can see. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010823214608.068E93E31>