Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:46:53 GMT
From:      Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   PERFORCE change 169132 for review
Message-ID:  <200910021446.n92EkrkE030036@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=169132

Change 169132 by stas@stas_yandex on 2009/10/02 14:46:47

	- Reflect the line numbers change in addressable test.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/valgrind/memcheck/tests/addressable.stderr.exp#5 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/valgrind/memcheck/tests/addressable.stderr.exp#5 (text+ko) ====

@@ -9,26 +9,16 @@
 For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
 ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
 Unaddressable byte(s) found during client check request
-   at 0x........: test2 (addressable.c:48)
-   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:125)
+   at 0x........: test2 (addressable.c:50)
+   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:127)
  Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
 
 Invalid write of size 1
-   at 0x........: test2 (addressable.c:51)
-   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:125)
+   at 0x........: test2 (addressable.c:53)
+   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:127)
  Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
 
 
-Process terminating with default action of signal N (SIGSEGV or SIGBUS)
- Bad memory (SIGSEGV or SIGBUS) at address 0x........
-   at 0x........: test2 (addressable.c:51)
-   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:125)
- If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
- overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
- possible), you can try to increase the size of the
- main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
- The main thread stack size used in this run was ....
-
 HEAP SUMMARY:
     in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks
   total heap usage: ... allocs, ... frees, ... bytes allocated
@@ -36,38 +26,15 @@
 For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
 
 For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
-
-HEAP SUMMARY:
-    in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks
-  total heap usage: ... allocs, ... frees, ... bytes allocated
-
-For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
-
-For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
-
-Process terminating with default action of signal N (SIGSEGV or SIGBUS)
- Bad memory (SIGSEGV or SIGBUS) at address 0x........
-   at 0x........: test4 (addressable.c:74)
-   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:125)
-
-HEAP SUMMARY:
-    in use at exit: ... bytes in ... blocks
-  total heap usage: ... allocs, ... frees, ... bytes allocated
-
-For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
-
-For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
 ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
 Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
-   at 0x........: test5 (addressable.c:85)
-   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:125)
+   at 0x........: test5 (addressable.c:87)
+   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:127)
  Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
 
 Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
-   at 0x........: test5 (addressable.c:91)
-   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:125)
+   at 0x........: test5 (addressable.c:93)
+   by 0x........: main (addressable.c:127)
  Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
 
 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200910021446.n92EkrkE030036>