Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:29:46 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Infinite loop bug in libc_r on 4.x with condition variables a nd signals Message-ID: <20041028232946.GA10099@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <41817778.4070801@elischer.org> References: <41804394.7020306@elischer.org> <41804D8E.2030003@freebsd.org> <41817778.4070801@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 03:49:28PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> re, how about it?
Give me an hour or two, yesterday was the first I saw of this so I
need to research it a bit. Is that OK?
> >>>>>FWIW, we are having (I think) the same problem on 5.3 with
> >>>>>libpthread. The
> >>>>>
> >>>>>panic there is in the mutex code about an assertion failing
> >>>>>because a thread
> >>>>>is on a syncq when it is not supposed to be.
Umm. Your patch changes only user-level code, correct? Please tell
me you can only panic a debugging kernel with user-level code issues.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041028232946.GA10099>