Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:41:43 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history 
Message-ID:  <12024.1088548903@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:10:52 EDT." <46A7D8A4-C9EF-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <46A7D8A4-C9EF-11D8-99F8-003065ABFD92@mac.com>, Charles Swiger write
s:

>> The future of ibcs2 and svr4 has been in doubt for a long time (and
>> still is pending developer attention), but appearantly most of the
>> previous discussion and warnings have not been noticed:
>[ ...cvs annotate... ]
>> Searching the major mailing lists (bugs, stable, current etc) failed
>> to return any hits about this.
>
>End-users may not read /usr/src/UPDATING or the published release notes 
>either, but at least those are the places they are _expected_ to look 
>at if they want to know what is changing.  I don't think we can 
>reasonably expect an end-user to look though the output of "cvs 
>annotate"...  :-)

The warning would appear if you tried to config a kernel containing
COMPAT_SVR4, and since there is no email, I conclude that nobody
who cared about COMPAT_SVR4 (in -current) has done that since the
message was added.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12024.1088548903>