Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 08:50:14 +0500 (GMT+0500) From: "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interval timer/System clock Message-ID: <199506080350.IAA11644@hq.icb.chel.su> In-Reply-To: <199506071237.WAA17067@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 7, 95 10:37:47 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> the others at rtprio 0. I think the priority doesn't affect swapping, > so for consistent timing a real time process might want extra wakeups to > keep itself in core and early wakeups to allow time for swapping it in; Does mlock() not work in FreeBSD ? Or does it not help in this case ? Serge Babkin ! (babkin@hq.icb.chel.su) ! Headquarter of Joint Stock Commercial Bank "Chelindbank" ! Chelyabinsk, Russia
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506080350.IAA11644>