Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:52:03 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 193916] Update port: vsftpd-ext update to staged.
Message-ID:  <bug-193916-13-o7d2YZBcFB@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193916-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-193916-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193916

Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Needs Triage                |In Discussion
                 CC|                            |pi@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Xu Jing from comment #0)
> Created attachment 147663 [details]
> diff base on ports tree r366889, because delete by r366890

Thanks. I tested it and it builds on poudriere (10.0-amd64, 9.1-amd64 and
8.4-i386). I have a few questions:

- Is there a reason 2.3.5 is used and not 3.0.2 ?
- Can you use @sample in pkg-plist instead of exec/unexec ? See

https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/plist-keywords.html#plist-keywords-sample

  for details.
- pkg-plist uses some shell script to detect/create users.
  Would using /usr/ports/UIDs etc work ? With USERS=ftp GROUPS=ftp ?
- Can you check if you can trim your @dirrm in pkg-plist ? See

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2014-September/074391.html

  for details on the changes related to @dirrm.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193916-13-o7d2YZBcFB>