Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:33:26 +0200 From: Martin <nakal@web.de> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Quo vadis, -CURRENT? (recent changes to cc & compatibility) Message-ID: <1063211606.593.46.camel@klotz.local> In-Reply-To: <3F5F2774.9010408@gmx.net> References: <3F5F2774.9010408@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Mi, 2003-09-10 um 15.30 schrieb Michael Nottebrock: > Sorry if this sounds a bit flame-ish, but the way I see it we now have a > system compiler in -CURRENT that doesn't even compile a hello world if > -pedantic is specified and breaks with lots of existing software out there Yes. I agree on this. I would also like to have a compiler which compiles with strictest warning settings possible, because I'm developing on several platforms at once. But I like gcc-3.x (for my C++ programs) very much and would like to continue programming with this compiler, even it does not compile hello world with -pedantic. Wouldn't it be better to complain in a gcc mailing list? You know exactly that FreeBSD-current is offering the most recent technologies and _this_ is why I like it. Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1063211606.593.46.camel>