Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:50:45 -0700
From:      "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>
To:        David Miller <dmiller@sparks.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RAID: Adaptec vs Mylex
Message-ID:  <20020326135045.A4301@panzer.kdm.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203261518160.67145-100000@search.sparks.net>; from dmiller@sparks.net on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:30:56PM -0500
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203261518160.67145-100000@search.sparks.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 15:30:56 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> Any input from real world users on the subject?  I'm most interested in
> the 3210S and 352.  My use would be with RAID 10 support of a busy
> database server doing zillions of writes/updates.  Speed writing small
> blocks is of the essence.
> 
> Reliability, robustness, speed are critical factors.  It will be hooked up
> to 10 or 12 15K drives.
> 
> Input?

If you want a comparison of the two controllers:

http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/markeditorial.html?prodkey=3210_wp&type=Common&cat=%2fCommon%2fRAID+Upgrade

The only catch is that the comparison was done with RAID-5, not RAID-10.

So the read speed in the benchmarks above may be comparable to RAID-10,
but the write speed for RAID-10 should be better.

If you want high performance with lots of small chunks of data, I would
recommend the Adaptec 5400S.  It has a hardware parity engine that speeds
up RAID-5 writes significantly.  (If you're only doing RAID-10, though, it
won't have any effect.)

(disclaimer:  I work for Adaptec.)

Ken
-- 
Kenneth Merry
ken@kdm.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020326135045.A4301>