Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Jul 2002 13:10:08 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Jeremy Lea <reg@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: gcc 3.1 can't compile XFree86-4-Server
Message-ID:  <20020703131008.A10840@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020703205602.A4834@shale.csir.co.za>; from reg@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:56:02PM %2B0200
References:  <200207031426.g63EQo802988@vega.vega.com> <p05111720b948cb09c717@[128.113.24.47]> <20020703092727.B8178@dragon.nuxi.com> <p05111723b948e1dc2098@[128.113.24.47]> <20020703180748.GJ769@starjuice.net> <p05111729b948eec02624@[128.113.24.47]> <20020703205602.A4834@shale.csir.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:56:02PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote:
> I can build x11/XFree86-4 with the following patches, which I harvested
> from various email's since the gcc 3.1 import.  Which ones are really
> needed, and why the X11 libraries are built four times during the build
> of the meta port, are what I need to figure out next...

Some one needs to do thru these and really deal with them.

* The patch to use -O0 (or remove -O) is wrong, and a test case should be
  submitted to the GCC people.

* The weak problem has been fixed in the FSF sources -- I could merge a
  a patch to our system GCC from the FSF sources.

* Someone needs to talk with the XFree86 people to get them to stop using
  `cc' on C++ code.  This is not just a FreeBSD issue for them.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020703131008.A10840>