Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 09:59:59 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-gnu@freefall.freebsd.org, gj@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb Makefile nm.h Message-ID: <199703131759.JAA04847@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 Mar 1997 17:07:23 %2B1100." <199703130607.RAA30784@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Agreed. kgdb makes no sense. From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb Makefile nm.h > Modified: gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb Makefile nm.h > Log: > add LINKS line to Makefile to automatically produce a link to kgdb > > define START_PROGRESS in nm.h to check whether gdb was invoked as kgdb > and set the kernel_debugging flag in that case. > > 2.2 candidate ? Backwards step. $ man kgdb No manual entry for kgdb $ apropos kgdb kgdb: nothing appropriate $ info kgdb ... There is no menu item "kgdb" in this node. $ info -f kgdb info: kgdb: File name too long ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ stale errno bug in info? It's more important to support one interface properly. The -k and -w flags are not documented in either gdb.1 or gdb.texi. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703131759.JAA04847>