Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:14:44 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel Thread scheduler Message-ID: <200111230614.fAN6Ei722956@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Nov 2001 13:58:08 PST." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111221353230.44466-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111221353230.44466-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111221353230.44466-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> Julian Elischer writes: : This is a valid point.. should I change the name in the next round a bit? : and if so what to? I don't really want "k_thread", any more than I would : think of changing proc to k_proc.. Theoretically a user program shouldn't : even know about proc and thread.. what is there in proc.h that a : user program needs? Well, there's always a typedef hack :-) /me ducks behind d_thread_t Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111230614.fAN6Ei722956>