Date: 20 Mar 2014 09:39:33 +0200 From: Nikola Kolev <koue@chaosophia.net> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: bsd.autotools.mk autotools execution order Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.5.1403200939330.96124@chaosophia.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Howdy, According to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.autotools.mk autotools execution order is: run-autotools-aclocal patch-autotools-libtool run-autotools-autoheader run-autotools-libtoolize run-autotools-autoconf run-autotools-automake According to autoreconf-2.69 -v -i execution order is: ... autoreconf-2.69: running: aclocal ... autoreconf-2.69: running: libtoolize ... autoreconf-2.69: running: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.69 ... autoreconf-2.69: running: /usr/local/bin/autoheader-2.69 ... autoreconf-2.69: running: automake ... >From port's make autoheader has been executed BEFORE libtoolize and autoconf. From autoreconf autoheader has been executed AFTER libtoolize and autoconf. I am trying to create new port and if execute autoreconf everything goes flat but if run make from the port autoheader starts to scream with missing folders which should be created by libtoolize. I have following lines in port's Makefile: USES=libtool USE_AUTOTOOLS= aclocal libtoolize autoconf automake autoheader -- Nikola
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Prayer.1.3.5.1403200939330.96124>