Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:55:29 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Henk van Oers <henk@signature.nl>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: portmaster -r vs. ports/UPDATING
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108251144580.20773@dee.signature.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20110824120044.9CFDB1065734@hub.freebsd.org>
References:  <20110824120044.9CFDB1065734@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[ multi -r arguments ]

In article <xs4all.4E560F4B.40609@freebsd.org>,
         Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> writes:
> On 08/25/2011 01:58, Matthias Andree wrote:
[...]

>> Perhaps this behaviour could change in a future version of portmaster,
>
> Patches are always welcome.

Can I send some money?

I also want to run portmaster -r without "argument list too long".




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1108251144580.20773>