Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:18:13 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "John Smith" <almarrie@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD Message-ID: <cb5206420611260418h70415e4buc807f001e9b0c9da@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0611260212sa53a2bcq6345f063b7bfdddf@mail.gmail.com> References: <499c70c0611260212sa53a2bcq6345f063b7bfdddf@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/26/06, John Smith <almarrie@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and maybe take active maintainership of it. You can try it just for the fun of it, but your problem reports will be met by a grinning "we told you so".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420611260418h70415e4buc807f001e9b0c9da>