Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 May 2002 13:28:28 -0700
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Why don't we search /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include by  default?
Message-ID:  <3CF539EC.EAD68F3C@mindspring.com>
References:  <20020529093009.C31668@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020529012544.14816380A@overcee.wemm.org> <20020529122327.C82424@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020528.221453.83474290.imp@village.org> <20020529140813.P82424@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020529125401.C2156@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
> > > Just because Linux is lame
> >
> > I think that's a rather blanked statement.
> 
> Doesn't make it any less true.

Almost said nearly the same thing.  I "played nice" instead.  8-).

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CF539EC.EAD68F3C>