Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Oct 1995 22:35:08 -0700
From:      Pete Delaney <pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net>
To:        asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu, se@zpr.uni-koeln.de, ache@astral.msk.su
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, netbsd-ports@netbsd.org, owner-sparclinux@vger.rutgers.edu, pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net, Wally@RockyMountain.rahul.net
Subject:   Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 - Port of HotJava to FreeBSD and NetBSD More Usefull?
Message-ID:  <199510110535.AA26288@RockyMountain.rahul.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
   > >} Well, so what do you guys think about updating the "port"?  (I know,
   > >} it's a binary-only port and we can't distribute the distfile/package
   > >} anyway....)  I've been using it since yesterday, and it feels really
   > >} "beta", so I won't update the port unless people really want the
   > >} change to go in.
   > 
   > I dislike this idea, it contains too many bugs for everyday usage
   > comparing to old version.

   > BTW, I think separate port (netscape2) will be nice addition.

Wouldn't a complete port of HotJava to SunOS 4.1.4, FreeBSD, NetBSD, 
and Linux be more in the tradition of BSD? I hate being SourceLess.

-pete



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510110535.AA26288>