Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:48:19 -0700
From:      Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
To:        Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why RELENG_9 branch is labeled as PRERELEASE and freebsd.org says FreeBSD is currently at 9.1-RC2 ?
Message-ID:  <508D7DF3.8080103@rawbw.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121028151758.5f866bcb@davenulle.org>
References:  <508C7445.6080809@rawbw.com> <20121028151758.5f866bcb@davenulle.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1

Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as "stable" 9.X branch, why then 
9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC? 
This looks strange to me.

Yuri



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?508D7DF3.8080103>