Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:49:55 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: rwatson@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness? Message-ID: <200505231049.55883.jkim@niksun.com> In-Reply-To: <20050523052211.GA65514@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200505191431.08189.jkim@niksun.com> <20050523052211.GA65514@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 23 May 2005 01:22 am, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:31:08PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > I am not sure about the meaning of 'true NUMA capable machines' > > but AMD64 is ccNUMA unless I am completely mistaken, and > > FreeBSD/amd64 is well-supported. Even multicore processors are > > available now > > ..snip.. > > I am working on extracting the CPU & memory topology on AMD Opteron > machines. For Athlon64 X2 (dual-core) there is nothing for FreeBSD > to do differently than today. Great. I am assuming you're working on ACPI SRAT/SLIT parsing, correct? > Once I have the ability to nicely express the topology on an > Opteron system, there are two heavy hitters that have said they > will consume the bits and work on optimizing FreeBSD for Opteron > systems. If you need any help, let me know. > For Intel dual-core HTT systems, there aren't any NUMA > characteristics I'm aware of. I believe you are correct. Jung-uk Kim > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505231049.55883.jkim>