Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:53:32 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: smp@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Testers please! Message-ID: <21170.937814012@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:24:47 %2B0800." <19990920012447.C1C1B1CC5@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, noted. I changed to to fail the probe but still use the hardware. Poul-Henning In message <19990920012447.C1C1B1CC5@overcee.netplex.com.au>, Peter Wemm writes : >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> If you have a PIIX4 based SMP system and run current, could you >> please try out this patch: >> >> http://phk.freebsd.dk/piix/ >> >> I'm very interested in hearing if there are any measurable difference >> apart from clock granularity being 3 times better. > >There is a problem with it as it tries to claim the same device as claimed >by pcisupport.c and intpm.c.. pcisupport.c is where some folks have been >hanging Tor Egge's RTC SMI trap patch from.. > >Cheers, >-Peter >-- >Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au > > -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21170.937814012>