Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Jun 2014 16:18:49 -0400
From:      Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com>
To:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 10-STABLE/sparc64 panic
Message-ID:  <D9350E94-1F01-4FFD-A51E-AD8761F5C9CF@distal.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC35853D-DA5E-4799-947C-4C64A0BC7D36@distal.com>
References:  <20140518083413.GK24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <751F7778-95CE-40FC-857F-222FB37737C0@distal.com> <20140518235853.GM24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <20140519145222.GN24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <A092DFEB-D5CF-473E-88BD-81B005C26C57@distal.com> <20140519193529.GO24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <20140519205047.GP24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <CA75738D-066D-4EDC-9018-89936EE861C6@distal.com> <AB5649B5-BBFB-4284-9CFF-4784D28A18F3@distal.com> <A9D37635-CA61-401B-BEAE-14C4F370BFD6@distal.com> <BC35853D-DA5E-4799-947C-4C64A0BC7D36@distal.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Jun 9, 2014, at 14:13, Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> wrote:
>=20
> [=85]
>=20
>  More information for the records.  I=92ll likely try to drop back =
just before
> r263508 (r263478) since r263508 was so seemingly large, in case I=92ve
> found the =93problem point=94.  One can hope.

  Oh well.  That was learned quickly.  r263478 booted once, but a second
attempt caused the multiple-boots-before-getting-to-multiuser.  So, =
moving
right along, I=92ll try r263401 in the more =93binary search=94 =
algorithm=85 =20

  Sorry for the noise for those that aren=92t directly curious about =
these results.

                            - Chris






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D9350E94-1F01-4FFD-A51E-AD8761F5C9CF>