Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:28:27 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>, Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 Available Message-ID: <p06110472bdad7279d295@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20041102045430.GA25111@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20041031201950.GA99257@bobbi.cse.buffalo.edu> <200411011653.39466.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> <20041102045430.GA25111@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:54 PM -0500 11/1/04, Ken Smith wrote: >On Mon, Nov 01, 2004, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > > > > Sorry for wasting your time, but why is there such a big difference > > between -stable and RC2? > >Don't apologize - no problem. > >I just did a cvs diff to make sure, and I'm not seeing any unexpected >differences between RELENG_5 and RELENG_5_3. The diff will show you >a bunch of files, many along the lines of what you mention, but the >only differences that it shows you are in the CVS version number >strings. The rest of the contents of the files are identical. It is much easier to 'diff' two branches if you check both of them out using '-kk', and then compare those two directories. That way you won't be distracted by hundreds of CVS-version-numbers mismatches. (With -kk, all files will be checked out without expanding any version numbers). -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06110472bdad7279d295>