Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:04:36 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Ken Gunderson <kgunders@teamcool.net> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Asus A8N Deluxe sli (for anyone thats using one) Message-ID: <20050904080436.GC20880@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050902160419.0b079288.kgunders@teamcool.net> References: <122ec19705090206416fd81365@mail.gmail.com> <20050902094726.36bb1340.kgunders@teamcool.net> <4318C217.4000604@jetnet.co.uk> <20050902160419.0b079288.kgunders@teamcool.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:04:19PM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > I would run away from any such board :-( > > That was my initial preference but when I started shoping realized how > far behind the VIA based stuff is I had to rethink this. Why is VIA based boards "so far behind"? SLI isn't supported on Linux nor FreeBSD, so that cannot be the reason. Early K8T890 boards won't support Athlon64 X2 dual-core CPU's, but the latest revision does. So what is so behind? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050904080436.GC20880>