Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:49:05 +0900 From: Tetsurou Okazaki <okazaki@FreeBSD.org> To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@ptavv.es.net> Cc: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>, desmo@bandwidth.org, papowell@astart.com, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Very old LPRng ports in ports tree Message-ID: <lxzo36b4ri.wl@dolphin.be.to> In-Reply-To: <20020122171012.33D165D0A@ptavv.es.net> References: <20020122165439.786793FC40@energyhq.homeip.net> <20020122171012.33D165D0A@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the message <20020122171012.33D165D0A@ptavv.es.net> "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@ptavv.es.net> wrote: > > From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> > > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:54:14 +0100 > > > > On Tuesday 22 January 2002 17:35, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > > future? The ports should be trivial as both distributions are > > > explicitly FreeBSD aware and install everything in the "right" places > > > for the FreeBSD norms. They do an even better job than the existing > > > port. > > > > Hey, so where is your patch and your PR then? :) > > > > > It would also be nice to see lprngtool added to the ports tree. > > > > Grab the porters handbook and get the thing running on FreeBSD :) > I'd be happy to do so, but I'd rather make sure I'm not stepping on the > toes of the current maintainers. > I already maintain one port and understand exactly what is involved. If > I hear nothing from either of the current maintainers, I'll go ahead and > provide and update for a committer to look at. I may go ahead and do > lprngtool myself, although I think it really should be folded into the > LPRng port to be installed when X libraries are available. See PR: 33207, 33208, 33209. -- Tetsurou To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lxzo36b4ri.wl>