Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:29:45 +0100
From:      Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC
Message-ID:  <20010114172945.A48122@freebie.demon.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200101141150.f0EBoBQ90011@mobile.wemm.org>; from peter@netplex.com.au on Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:50:11AM -0800
References:  <20010114123950.A47123@freebie.demon.nl> <200101141150.f0EBoBQ90011@mobile.wemm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:50:11AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:15:11AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> [..]
> > > The bottom line is that I feel the time is just about right to yank i386
> > > entirely, not just taking it out of GENERIC.  But I wont push for that
> > 
> > Fine with me, but a change of policy as I see it. So, not something to sneak
> > in with a commit to GENERIC. Or ?
> 
> I dont make policy.  I just said what I think.  While I agree with the

Neither do I, or have any desire to do so :)

> commit John did, if I had my way (which I do not) I would have gone
> further. :-)

As I read the various comments, I think the idea that starting with 5.0 
dropping support for 386 is a sensible idea that is easily defendable as good
policy. I personally don't think 4.x should go down that road.

cheers,

Wilko

-- 
|   / o / /  _  	 Arnhem, The Netherlands    	email: wilko@freebsd.org
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte	 http://www.freebsd.org 	http://www.nlfug.nl


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010114172945.A48122>