Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 11:23:33 -0800 (PST) From: Kip Macy <kip@lyris.com> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AIO was Re: Kernel threads Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.05.10001031121430.6947-100000@luna.lyris.com> In-Reply-To: <3870F6B6.EC4EE37E@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Wes Peters wrote: > Kip Macy wrote: > > > > > > > > The best fix I've thought of thus far (other than async I/O, which I > > > understand isn't ready for prime time) would be to have a number of kernel > > > > Speaking of AIO, which I would really like to use if possible, how > > actively maintained is it? The copyright on vfs_aio.c is 1997, suggesting > > to me that John Dyson has moved onto other things. > > It's passively maintained. ;^) > > I've become a little familiar with the code, and BDE has graciously agreed > to review whatever I do to make sure I don't hobble it. If you need help, > yell. > I have a little, ~300LOC, program in which aio does not behave as I think it should. Would it be possible for me to send it to you and have you take a look at it? -Kip To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.4.05.10001031121430.6947-100000>