Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Jan 1999 23:21:35 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell)
Cc:        db@abyssinian.sleepycat.com, jb@cimlogic.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, openldap-devel@openldap.org, yusufg@huge.net
Subject:   Re: Strange warnings when compiling Berkeley DB on FreeBSD 3.0
Message-ID:  <199901082321.QAA19744@usr05.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <199901082229.JAA00644@cimlogic.com.au> from "John Birrell" at Jan 9, 99 09:29:09 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Linking against both libc and libc_r will cause strange results.
> Using gcc -pthread is the correct way.

Why?

Is libc weak symbol support broken, or is libc_r incomplete?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901082321.QAA19744>