Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:19:04 +0100
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@googlemail.com>
To:        cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws>
Cc:        "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The question of moving vi to /bin
Message-ID:  <b79ecaef0906240719s4a6f2f18g32a3bb85f46988b2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090624140846.GB1974@phenom.cordula.ws>
References:  <d873d5be0906240613s1050323bpdd28aaedddf2cb9d@mail.gmail.com>  <20090624140846.GB1974@phenom.cordula.ws>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/6/24 cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws>:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:13:49AM -0700, b. f. wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 23 June 2009 15:41:48 Manish Jain wrote:
>>
>> >About ed first. I might annoy a few people (which would gladden me in
>> >this particular case), but ed was just one of Ken Thompson's nightmares
>> >which he managed to reproduce in Unix with great precision. By no
>> >stretch of imagination would it qualify as an editor, because an editor
>> >can meaningfully edit only what it can first show. And ed has never had
>> >anything to show. A modern operating system like FreeBSD should really
>> >be kicking ed out of the distribution completely : bad ideas don't have
>> >to be necessarily perpetuated just for the sake of compliance with the
>> >original concept of Unix.
>>
>> If you want to make a case for replacing ed(1), you're going to have
>> to come up with some concrete reasons for doing so, not just make a
>> (long and hyperbolic) statement that you don't like it.
>
> Please don't touch/remove ed(1)!
>
> =A0* It's still very useful on non-curses/termcap capable terminals
> =A0 =A0like raw serial lines etc.
>
> =A0* It's also very useful in batch/script mode, as there are some
> =A0 =A0multi-line text processing problems that you can't tackle with
> =A0 =A0sed(1) alone, and where awk(1) or even perl, python etc.. are
> =A0 =A0overkill.
>
> -cpghost.
>

I may be mistaken, but isn't ed required for POSIX compliance?

Chris



--=20
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b79ecaef0906240719s4a6f2f18g32a3bb85f46988b2>